/ Blog / By

How Does PoE+ Differ from Standard PoE for Sacramento’s Smart Building Systems?

In the evolving landscape of smart buildings, integrating networked lighting, sensors, access control, and environmental controls is no longer optional — it’s essential. For Low Voltage Cabling for Offices in Sacramento, developers, and systems integrators, one core choice underpins much of the infrastructure: whether to rely on PoE (Power over Ethernet) or the upgraded PoE+ (also known as IEEE 802.3at) standard.

1. What Is PoE? A Quick Primer

Power over Ethernet (PoE) enables the transmission of both data and DC electrical power over standard twisted-pair Ethernet cabling (e.g. Cat5e, Cat6) from a single device, typically called a Power Sourcing Equipment (PSE), to a Powered Device (PD). The original standard is IEEE 802.3af (sometimes called PoE or Type 1). Wikipedia+2Cabling Install+2

Under IEEE 802.3af:

PoE enabled the first wave of “smart” devices like VoIP phones, low-power sensors, and basic IP cameras without requiring separate power lines or AC outlets.

2. Understanding PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at)

PoE+ is an enhancement of the original PoE standard, formalized under IEEE 802.3at (sometimes called Type 2). Its purpose is to support devices that demand more power—such as more capable Wi-Fi access points, pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) cameras, or lighting modules. info.globalit.com+4TIA Online+4Cabling Install+4

Under IEEE 802.3at:

Thus, PoE+ offers nearly double the power headroom of standard PoE, which translates into more flexibility for “smarter” devices.

3. Key Technical Differences: PoE vs PoE+

Here’s a side-by-side breakdown of the technical differences that matter for smart building systems:

3.1 Power Levels & Efficiency

FeaturePoE (802.3af)PoE+ (802.3at)
Maximum PSE output per port15.4 W TIA Online+2Cabling Install+230 W TIA Online+2Cabling Install+2
Maximum PD input (nominal)~12.95 W after losses TIA Online+2Cabling Install+2~25.5 W TIA Online+2Cabling Install+2
Efficiency/Loss marginMore significant percent losses over long runsBetter margin for losses, less voltage drop relative to required load
Headroom marginMore constrained in high-demand devicesMore margin for future growth or device changes

Because PoE+ nearly doubles the maximum deliverable power, it is more tolerant of longer cable runs or greater voltage drop before a device starves of power.

3.2 Cable & Pair Usage

Both PoE and PoE+ typically use two twisted pairs in a standard Ethernet cable to carry power (in addition to data pairs). TIA Online+3Cabling Install+3The Network Installers+3

However, one key difference is that PoE+ devices may draw more current. In situations where many devices are aggregated, proper cable gauge, bundling, and thermal considerations become more critical.

Later-generation standards like PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt) begin using all four pairs for power, but that is beyond the core PoE vs. PoE+ comparison. Cabling Install+2NetAlly+2

3.3 Voltage, Current, and Line Losses

Because all PoE/PoE+ systems carry power over copper wiring, power loss due to resistance (I²R losses) and voltage drop is inevitable, especially over longer cable runs. The higher power delivery of PoE+ gives more “slack” to accommodate losses without dropping below device minimum voltage.

In particular:

  • At longer runs (e.g., 80–100 meters, nearing Ethernet limit), the voltage drop is more significant. A standard PoE-powered device may suffer under-voltage, whereas a PoE+ setup has more headroom.
  • The current (amperage) required for the same device power doubles in PoE+ vs PoE for the same power — that means current density in the cable rises, making correct gauge and the best practices for low voltage cable management in facilities.
  • Designers often apply derating and margin calculations (e.g. targeting 75–80% of maximum) to allow for aging of cables, connector losses, and future expansions.

3.4 Device Compatibility

One of the advantages of PoE+ is that it is backward-compatible with standard PoE devices. A PoE+ switch or injector can step down to support a standard PoE device without damage. info.globalit.com+2Cabling Install+2

However, the reverse is not true: a PoE-only switch cannot reliably power devices that demand more than ~15 W. That limitation becomes critical when newer smart-building devices require higher wattage.

4. Why These Differences Matter in Smart Buildings

In a smart building deployment — especially in a city like Sacramento with its mix of new construction and retrofits — these technical differences play out in many practical ways.

4.1 Use Cases: Lighting, Sensors, Cameras, Access Control

Smart building systems often include:

  • LED lighting / PoE lighting fixtures
    Many modern “smart lighting” systems (e.g. dimmable, color-tunable, or sensor-integrated) demand more power than a basic sensor or camera. PoE+ gives the margin to support such fixtures.
  • Cameras, especially PTZ or thermal / IR types
    Advanced cameras with pan-tilt-zoom, heaters, or IR illumination can draw more than the standard PoE budget. PoE+ ensures sufficient headroom.
  • Environmental sensors, HVAC actuators, and controls
    Controllers and thermostats are often low-power, but actuators or integrated local controls may require more.
  • Access control, badge readers, locks, door strikes
    Some locking mechanisms or electrified hardware may need more power than a basic access-reader alone.

In many smart building deployments, the same cable run may serve multiple device types. A PoE+ backbone allows mixing power-hungry devices with low-power ones more safely.

4.2 Headroom & Futureproofing

One of the recurring challenges in infrastructure design is planning for incremental growth. Suppose a building initially uses PoE for simple devices, but later the owner wants to add video analytics, more lighting, or more sensors. If the system was built strictly to PoE limits, you may hit capacity ceilings, requiring expensive upgrades.

PoE+ lets you “overprovision” capacity, reducing the risk of needing to replace switches or recable. It gives room for future devices and evolving requirements.

4.3 System Resilience & Redundancy

Smart building systems need high reliability. If a power line is marginal, a device might temporarily drop offline under load. PoE+ gives more voltage resilience, making the system more robust against transient peaks, aging cabling, or device fluctuations.

Also, if you design a redundant or failover path, having extra margin helps ensure fallback paths still deliver sufficient power.

4.4 Energy Efficiency & Loss Considerations

Delivering more power over copper incurs losses, and overprovisioning wastes energy if not managed carefully. That said, the relative efficiency drop of PoE+ vs PoE is moderate when designed well.

Key points:

5. Sacramento / California Context

PoE and PoE+ technical theory must be adapted to local realities in Sacramento, California. Here are some contextual considerations:

5.1 Local Building & Low Voltage Codes

In California, Title 24 (Part 6) defines state-level building energy efficiency standards, including requirements for lighting, controls, and energy systems in new construction and renovations. California Energy Commission

Additionally, Sacramento has adopted Ordinance 2022-0027, which mandates that new buildings (three stories or less) be fully electric (i.e. resisting fossil fuel infrastructure) as of January 2023, unless certain exceptions apply. City of Sacramento This local emphasis on electrification aligns with the push toward low-voltage smart systems including PoE-based controls.

Low-voltage systems (like PoE cabling) are often subject to separate permitting, inspection, and compliance processes. In Sacramento, many commercial low-voltage cabling projects do require permits and inspections. sacramentolowvoltagecompany.com+1

Moreover, fire and life-safety codes, conduit fills, plenum ratings, and separation from high-voltage systems must all be respected in building projects. Sac Low Voltage Techs

5.2 Permitting, Licensing & Inspections

  • In many cases, installation of structured cabling or low-voltage systems in commercial buildings in Sacramento must pass inspections and adhere to City and County rules. sacramentolowvoltagecompany.com+1
  • Contractors may need appropriate low-voltage or limited-energy licensing (depending on local statutes).
  • Code reviewers may examine cable rating (plenum vs non-plenum), conduit fill, separation, junction box accessibility, and path routing to ensure safety and compliance.

5.3 Climate, Density, and Retrofit Implications

Sacramento’s hot summers and occasional high humidity influence HVAC loads and thus the importance of sensor-driven control systems. Smart systems that dynamically manage HVAC, lighting, and ventilation can reduce energy use.

Many Sacramento buildings are older, so retrofitting is common. In retrofit projects, you frequently face constraints in conduit, ceiling plenum space, and existing infrastructure limitations. In such constrained environments, the extra margin of PoE+ can help overcome losses or limited path lengths.

6. Design & Deployment Best Practices

To get the full benefit of PoE+, and to avoid surprises, follow these best practices:

6.1 Power Budgeting & Link Design

  1. List all devices and their maximum wattage (not average).
  2. Derate for losses and margin — e.g. assume 70–80% utilization to preserve headroom.
  3. Consider the longest run — calculate voltage drop and losses over the worst-case path.
  4. Group devices sensibly — don’t overload a single switch with all high-power devices if you can distribute them.
  5. Plan for expansion — leave spare ports and capacity where feasible.

6.2 Cabling, Connectors & Testing

  • Use high-quality, low-resistance cables (e.g. Cat6A or better) for power runs.
  • Use proper connectors, maintain good terminations, and minimize intermediate splice points.
  • Avoid bundling too many power-bearing cables together in tight spaces, which can raise temperature and resistance.
  • Test each run under load and measure voltage at the far end to verify designs.
  • Periodic periodic testing (e.g. every few years) ensures integrity over time.

6.3 Redundancy, Fault-Tolerance, & Switch Design

  • Use redundant PSEs or power paths where reliability is critical (e.g. dual uplinks or dual power supplies).
  • Use switches that support per-port power monitoring and fault alarms.
  • Where possible, design layered power delivery: e.g. local distribution switches closer to devices to reduce cable length.
  • Enforce per-port limits so a failed device or surge cannot overload shared resources.

6.4 Monitoring, Maintenance & Lifecycle Planning

  • Choose switches with SNMP/NetFlow or power telemetry features to monitor real-time usage.
  • Log power draw over time and flag unusual spikes or device failures.
  • Plan for cable aging, equipment replacement, and degradation of connectors.
  • Document every run, device, and path for ease of future troubleshooting or upgrades.

7. Potential Pitfalls & Misconceptions

  • “PoE+ always solves problems” — Using PoE+ doesn’t absolve you from doing proper power budgeting or cable design.
  • Exceeding maximums — Just because a switch supports 30 W per port doesn’t mean you should plan for 30 W on every port.
  • Assuming infinite distance — Ethernet standards limit link length (100 m); power losses still apply.
  • Neglecting cooling / bundling effects — High-current cables in tight bundles can heat up and increase resistance.
  • Underestimating code or permit constraints — Local codes may restrict routing, require pathway separation, or limit low-voltage work scope.
  • Ignoring future proofing — A design that barely meets immediate needs may fail too soon; leaving margin is wiser.

8. Future Trends: PoE++ / 802.3bt and Beyond

While PoE vs PoE+ is the core contrast today, the industry is rapidly moving toward PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt) and beyond.

  • IEEE 802.3bt (Type 3 / Type 4) can deliver up to 60 W or 100 W (or more) per port by using all four pairs and more sophisticated power negotiation. TIA Online+3Cabling Install+3Reolink+3
  • This extra power supports more ambitious device types: digital displays, local compute nodes, advanced HVAC actuators, and convergence of building systems.
  • In a Sacramento smart building deployment, moving to PoE++ might make sense for future-proofed installations, especially in green buildings and electrified system designs.
  • However, that comes with its own challenges (higher current, cabling, heat dissipation), so a balanced design is still needed.

Thus, when planning a new system today, it’s wise to pick architectures that can eventually support PoE++ evolution, even if you start with PoE+.

9. Conclusion & Key Takeaways

  • PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at) offers substantially more power headroom than standard PoE (802.3af), making it better suited for the richer device ecosystem of smart buildings.
  • That extra margin translates to improved robustness, flexibility, future-proofing, and resilience — so long as you design wisely (power budgeting, cabling, redundancy).
  • In Sacramento, local codes, permitting, and electrification mandates add practical constraints and opportunities: permit compliance, inspection, and alignment with California’s push for electric buildings.
  • While PoE+ is often sufficient today, designers should be ready to evolve toward PoE++ (802.3bt) for more demanding systems.

If you’re launching or upgrading a smart building system in Sacramento, starting with PoE+ is typically the safer, more forward-compatible choice — provided you maintain good engineering discipline.